Showing posts with label England Rugby League. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England Rugby League. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Strike Whilst It's Hot - International Rugby League

We're seven games in to this 2013 Rugby League World Cup and hasn't it been great so far!

We've had good crowds, close games, big hits, upsets, skill and drama.

I hope it continues throughout. There are some games that will test the good will earned so far - the Ireland v Australia game is one to really test where we're at and it would be great to see that risk deliver - but this is the time to come up with a plan. A way forward that holds onto this early momentum. Not just for this tournament, but the international game beyond.

Us fans should enjoy the present, but the administrators at the RLIF and the national bodies need consider the future. They need to come up with a plan to take advantage of the current positive light shining on the international game.

There is a dark cloud hovering in the background of this tournament - that no formal announcements for the 2014 international calendar or beyond to the next world cup have been made.

Now is the time, and here is what I would suggest.

A five year rotation of events. I know most international sporting rotations are four years (olympics, soccer world cups, lions tours etc.) but they don't have to be.

Say 2013 is Year One. It's a world cup year, so the next world cup should be 2018. Unless the strength of the weaker/emerging nations comes on fast, this year's format makes sense as its working well!

Year Two (i.e. 2014 in my example) - Australia or New Zealand (alternating) play a proper tour and test series against Great Britain in Britain. Other European / North American nations host tours from Pacific Island nations, or vice versa.

Year Three (2015) - GB tour Australia or New Zealand (alternating) in test series with tour games hopefully thrown in. Other European and North American sides play tour games with Pacific Islands again (alternate northern/southern hemisphere).

Year Four (2016) - Britain breaks into constituent parts for teams to build to the next world cup. A number of four nations tournaments based on world ranking will be played. The 'Top Four' league alternates between England and Australia, other leagues moving between northern and southern hemisphere based on teams involved/finances etc.

Year Five (2017) - a European nations tournament between top 6 (8 if game grows) nations in region and an equivalent for southern hemisphere and other regions.

Ranking points from year four and year five games would decide which nations join Australia, New Zealand and England at the next world cup.

I think key is helping emerging nations grow, both with domestic exposure and from greater buy in to their long term cause by qualifying players from NRL and Super League.

That's my proposal (admittedly not thought through in great detail!), what's yours?

Friday, 2 August 2013

England's World Cup Half Back Options

Probably the most difficult positions England (or Great Britain) have found to fill in the last 20 years have been the crucial 6 and 7 positions.

Since 2008, 13 different combinations have started international matches for England. That starts to underline the problem, although Kevin Sinfield and Richie Myler have formed a bit of a regular pairing in the recent past. The real problem though is no-one knows who to pick, and arguments can be made for a number of players.

The front-runners and most mentioned names are Sinfield, Myler, Rangi Chase and Gareth Widdop. A host of other players could also be considered in the reckoning based on being in and around the England squads in recent years - Rob Burrow, Danny McGuire, Matty Smith, Jonny Lomax and Stefan Ratchford are those I see as being the outside chances of World Cup places, not to mention Danny Brough who has firmed tied himself to Scotland's cause now.

Burrow has played a lot of dummy half (you can't call him a hooker!), Lomax has predominantly been seen as a full-back this year at St Helens and Ratchford has played across the back line for Warrington, but all these players would are naturals in the halves. Their numbers are skewed by the positions they've played, but they are definite options for England.

Here are this season's current numbers for the players in the hunt (as of 1 August 2013 - Super League or NRL games only) to see how the players are going - (note: the available NRL stats aren't consistent with the Super League ones so Gareth Widdop is missing some numbers, and different positions played by some players affects some numbers, which I will try and point out where needed)
I'm going to start with Kevin Sinfield. It seems that he will be the captain of the team, so it would be a massive shock if he doesn't play. Some talk has been had about him being used at hooker if James Roby doesn't get over his injury issues, and people are still confused about the number 13 he wears on his Leeds shirt, but if he plays I can't see it being outside of the halves.

His leadership shouldn't be questioned, so with his club record so great in big matches you have to credit him in that regard and feel that will work in his favour for England selection. A big factor in close games is goal kicking, and of the kickers in the sample he is performing the best this year at 87% success. These factors almost makes him worth his place you would feel.

He also leads the group in some defensive categories - total tackles, marker tackles and tackles per game - as well as having an good tackle success percentage (93%). These numbers might be bumped up from a half back perspective because he tends to defend more central than halves as Rob Burrow is hidden out wide when he is playing a dummy half role. This forces more defensive involvement and it should be noted he give away the most penalties of the player looked at.

The real criticism is his offensive productivity - he isn't likely to break the line or bust a tackle very much and he hasn't had much immediate impact on tries being scored, with a contribution of less than a one try or assist per game. Given how often he is on the ball, it has to be considered a weakness that he isn't creating more scores.

Richie Myler has been his chief partner of late in England sides. Myler has been impressive this year in taking more responsibility in organising and running the Warrington attack in Lee Briers extended absences. Contributing tries is the biggest positive for him - having scored the most and assisted the second most of England's options. Only Rangi Chase, who touches the ball a lot more, makes more metres per game out of the players who have played in the halves predominantly this year. He can break tackles and hit gaps as well as get the ball away to teammates. He is definitely a threat in attack, maybe more across the board than any of the other options.

As well as the organisation concerns that he now seems to have put to bed, the main question over Myler might be defence. A 90% tackle success, a low number of penalties and a reasonable effort as a marker defender suggest he might have upped his game in this area too. That leaves only his long kicking game as a potential issue, but if he has Sinfield and Sam Tomkins around then he has support in that area.

Rangi Chase is a controversial figure in this shake up. Many don't see him as being an acceptable choice because of his eligibility being on a residency basis. But he is available so I'll not dwell on that issue.

He leads many categories in the sample when it comes to having ball in hand - tackle busts, carries, gaining metres, attacking kicks and offloads are all things he does in greater amounts than the others. He has also kicked a few 40/20s, which can be useful. As you would expect with the player who touches the ball the most, he also makes the most errors, although an average of almost 2 per game could be regarded as too high when England will be playing teams that can take advantage.

He is a creative players who tries things and pulls things off that other players simply can't do, but the big question is in defence. He has the worst tackle success of the group by a wide margin, especially from his main rivals for the places, and this is despite him being by far the least active in defence (aside from Lomax, who having played mostly full-back wouldn't be called on to tackle often being behind the defensive line). Chase only makes 7.3 successful tackles per match and he has missed more tackles than any other player. Temperament may also be an issue with previous history of suspension and being the only England eligible player to have spent time in the sin-bin this year.

Gareth Widdop is a player who hasn't been given a starting role in the halves for England yet. This is despite the major point on his side that he is the only option with NRL experience, and some experience at that winning the Grand Final with Melbourne in 2012 and getting a big money contract with St George for 2014 onwards.

His stats are hard to judge as they aren't complete and I can't be sure they are recorded consistently with the Super League numbers. The areas he performs best are average gain per carry and the relatively low error count. His try involvement is very low and he doesn't carry the ball much, although he has to compete with the Queensland and Australia 'Big 3' for play making responsibilities and who wouldn't play second fiddle to them. His defensive numbers aren't great either though, but I would put a big asterisk on all his figures in that he does play in the better stronger competition. He also has an injury question mark, with his NRL season almost certainly ended by injury already.

Of the rest, Rob Burrow's lack of errors is impressive, but his high number of dummy half runs can partially be ignored when considering him as a half. His versatility could help hm feature in the squad and the odd burst out of dummy half from him could be dangerous, but I'm not looking at him as a 'hooker' option here. He hasn't missed many tackles, but he doesn't make many either and often get helped out by his teammates, so I don't know how much you can read into this.

Danny McGuire is another like Sinfield and Widdop who hasn't really created a great deal for teammates. He has missed quite a lot of the season with injury and doesn't stand out in any of the categories. He hasn't really performed at the international level in the past and his chance may have ran out because of his lack of impact on the current season, although with Leeds you never know what form might be to come from August onwards, which might put him more in the picture.

Matty Smith got into the frame during the 2012 Exiles series and then got a move to Wigan where he will experience a final and playoff football for the first time as a key player in the team. He has shown usefulness in 40/20 and drop goal kicking, but I'm not sure this is enough to overcome some of the other issues. His defending isn't always brilliant, although a 93% tackle success is promising. He doesn't make many metres himself and doesn't directly get involved in many tries, even though he often features in the build up. The biggest plus for him is a pre-existing relationship with Sam Tomkins for those sweep plays you would look to use Sam on, but I can't see that getting him selected. He is only really an option if others get injured before October.

Jonny Lomax hasn't been playing in the halves, which accounts for his low tackle and kicking numbers. He hasn't given away many penalties or errors, but his relative lack of involvement would be a cause for this. He is another who has missed a lot of play through injury and seeing him in the full-back role for Saints means he too would only be an option if there are injuries to other, despite he definite talent and creative potential.

Stefan Ratchford is an interesting one for me. His versatility and club form could see him find a place in the squad yet, but his lack of game time as a half might work against him getting that 6 shirt on his back. He has good numbers for tackle busts and breaks, but this will be assisted by him running in the centres where you get more space and often oppose smaller players. He has a glorious natural talent for the game, but I don't really see him making the final cut unfortunately - he isn't first choice for his club so you wouldn't expect him to be for his country.

One final player to look at is Danny Brough, who we know won't be playing for England. He has had a great season so far with Huddersfield. He has been very creative and his kicking game, whether attacking or from deep (6 40/20s), has been a massive factor in Huddersfield's season. He's a good goal kicker, although second to Sinfield. He doesn't have stand out defensive numbers and you think he can be targeted, particularly by direct running second row forwards. He would be a very nice option for England and I'd probably on form have him in my starting pair despite some defensive questions but he'll be leading Scotland instead.

So, who would I pick. Well for all the criticism I've labelled at Sinfield for years as I feel he has been overrated as a player, you can't overrate him as a leader. He is the captain and I would pick him in my half back combo. His kicking game can be a momentum changer as he quickly drives penalties to touch or knocks over goals from all angles. Also, we'll need to defend hard and physically against the Aussies and Kiwis and his added size and tackling numbers will help in that regards. You can surround him with speed and spark in the other six backs with the talent available to Steve McNamara in a fully fit England squad.

Alongside him I would pick Richie Myler. They've developed some rapport in the last four or five England games and he does have the attacking spark Sinfield might lack whilst not being as much of a liability as Rangi Chase can be when he doesn't come off, which against the best in the world it will be hard to do for an inconsistent and often very individual talent.

Widdop does play NRL but he won't be match ready you have to expect. I also wouldn't play him with Sinfield as I don't think there would be enough creativity and sharp attacking instinct in front of some tough defensive lines. If he were fit, and if Sinfield weren't the captain, then I'd probably put the 6 shirt on his back. In an ideal world I think I would want Widdop and Brough in this world cup squad as the starting halves, but Sinfield and Myler are the best combination that will be available in my opinion.

Saturday, 20 July 2013

Is 2013 Make or Break for England Rugby League? Should we go back to Great Britain?

I'll start by saying I loved the Great Britain test series' against Australia and New Zealand. I have Great Britain shirts, but no England Rugby League shirt. When I was getting into Rugby League around the turn of the millennium there was the awful World Cup for England, but then these great contests with Great Britain against the best in the world. Whilst I still attend England games now and want them to win, I miss the Lions fixtures. I won't let that stop me being objective though.

Richard De La Riviere's recent book 'Rugby League: A Critical History 1980-2013' (a highly recommended read) starts with a couple of chapters looking at the international game over the last 33 years.

Amongst all the things that need sorting out at the moment by the RFL, from the prominent placement in his book, it's pretty clear that this is one De La Riviere feels is important. It isn't something I've thought or commented a great deal on, but after reading his book I've been giving it more thought.

One thing that has kept coming up ever since the change came into effect after 2007, is that we should be going back to Great Britain. History, brand and fan support are often reasons given for doing this. De La Riviere makes a great point about the damage being done to the Celtic nations by all their qualified players preferring to target an England place as its the only way to consistently play against the Aussies and Kiwis.

Ironically, 'consistency' was the reason Richard Lewis felt the move to break up Great Britain was a good thing, saying "it has always been illogical that we play as Great Britain for three or four years, and when the World Cup comes along, suddenly we become England"

The decision was made before the 2013 World Cup to be held in the Northern Hemisphere had been finalised, but you have to think maximising chances of a home win whilst still developing a successful, viable tournament was a factor in the decision that was made back in 2005.

Great Britain went out on a high with a 3-0 series win against a (depleted) New Zealand side in their 2007 series. The England era started pretty woefully with the dismal 2008 World Cup. Although the side would have been broken up into England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland for that tournament anyway, it was a sign of things to come and despite a couple of wins on home soil against the Kiwis, results against the southern hemisphere sides have been largely disappointing - an aggregate of -98 in five games against Australia since 2009, with no wins.

The most reasonable explanation for breaking up the Lions brand and reverting to England Rugby League is that they wanted to build a 'club mentality' and develop a consistent group of players with an eye on giving it a strong push for the home World Cup. What happens if it doesn't work?

Well, I'll firstly suggest what good may have been done. Importantly, regular live BBC TV coverage has returned in the recent past after Sky monopolised the international coverage for the first decade or so of the Super League era. And, the BBC coverage is to continue through the next cycle of Four-Nations tournaments up to the 2017 World Cup. With such investment in the sport, you would hope BBC give the coverage a push year on year and greater national interest is generated.

Another commendable step has been the development of the Elite Training Squad concept. This has given the players more opportunity to meet up regularly and form some relationships that should prompt a more connected and cohesive unit on the field. The players certainly seem to enjoy it, although would probably be gagged from telling us if they felt it was a waste of time. Steve McNamara's recent trip to catch up with the NRL based players has been heavily criticised by fans, but I also think this is a good step to make sure there is some integration amongst the players who can't join up with the ETS on a regular basis.

Whilst those are positive recent developments, there are negatives to balance things out.

The loss to Ireland, Wales and Scotland of potential players, despite what Richard Lewis asserted in 2005, has been noted above and is better covered by De La Riviere's book. It certainly shouldn't be forgotten but isn't something I'm going to dwell on.

The other big negative point relates to the very defence of the switch made by Richard Lewis of 'consistency'. It also puts cracks in the ETS system. From 2008 to 2012, England have fielded 13 different starting half-back combinations in 24 internationals, and haven't played NRL winning stand-off Gareth Widdop in any of them. This isn't a new problem, GB had issues in consistently getting a play making partnership for years too, but is surely one the consistency and ETS system should have helped England solve. We're now going into the World Cup with the starting half-backs still an open question.

Although I've previously spoken up our chances of success, we'll still enter the 2013 World Cup as distant second/third favourites behind the Kangaroos. I wouldn't pick quite the same team I went for in November last year by the way, but that'll be for another time.

Surely though if England don't win the World Cup, or at the very least push Australia really close in the final, then the whole move from Great Britain has failed? 

Maybe, maybe not...I'll make one final observation before leaving you to make your own conclusions.

Crowd figures are something De La Riviere also goes into as an issue, and I will dwell on this a little. In all home non-World Cup games (but including the world cup rated tests of the late 1980s), during the GB era 1980 to 2007, gates averaged 21,473. In all England home internationals since 2007 (excluding Exiles games) the average drops to 19,144 - not bad considering a higher proportion of games against Wales and France. Now, the high ticket end of season Australia and New Zealand matches - GB 1980-2007, 25,764; England 2008-onwards (2009 & 2011 series), 28,919 - better as England, surprisingly so. What about just in Super League era versus the big boys? GB 1996-2007, 25,004 compared to that England figure of 28,919. (There is an average of 26,618 for GB 1980-1995 by the way, despite a number of 40,000+ crowds vs. Australia.)

Maybe the fans aren't as put off by the 'rebranding'. This possibly isn't the negative people have made out. From the criticisms I hear and read, I expected it to be. Crowds for the top international fixtures have remained fairly consistent between GB and England eras. It isn't a factor that should influence any future decisions either way, the fans still turn up.

Oh, and whatever you think about the name of our international side, I still recommend Richard De La Riviere's book.

Tuesday, 13 November 2012

2013 Rugby League World Cup - One year out preview

With the Autumn trail matches over and the World Cup less than 12 months away, I've been wondering if England can win this World Cup next year. I'm not sure if this is misguided optimism but I really think we have a decent shot. I've been thinking about it for weeks now and I've not managed to convince myself otherwise. 

I assure you it's nothing to do with three big wins in this Autumn northern hemisphere series. If anything I thought we were scratchy and disorganised in attack, rarely tested in defense and a little bit unprofessional in going about our business in this recent series. Add to that a lot of big name players were missing, some of whom would walk into any squad in the tournament, and I'm not convinced we can take a lot from this little showing.

So, why do I think we have a fair crack at this?
  • We have some of the best players in the world! This isn't my opinion, this is the opinion of the wider Rugby League world. Rugby League World listed Sam Burgess as 7th best player in the world and Sam Tomkins was voted 10th best player in the world. 9 other England players made the RLW top 100 for 2012. Ryan Hall retained his title as RLIF Winger of the Year and James Graham was awarded the top prop honours.
  • We have more and more players playing at the highest level! The NRL has come hunting for British talent and has helped bring some guys through for us as well. Gareth Ellis leaves Wests to come back home but he has three outstanding years and one injury dogged one at the top level. Gareth Widdop gets in the premiership winning Melbourne side week in week out. James Graham made a big impact at minor premiers Canterbury. Sam Burgess is a leader at the returning to competitiveness South Sydney Rabbitohs, with his brother Luke keeping a starting jumper through most of 2012 too and George even showing potential, with his twin Tom also now on the NRL roster. Jack Reed and Chris Heighington have come through NRL systems and are experienced top level players. Even Scott Moore has been given a lifeline in the NRL at the Cowboys and rumours have been out there for the likes of Briscoe and Hock to be in demand too.
  • We have a squad full of winners! Look though any team England have put out in the last two years and you'll see that almost to a man they have winners medals on the mantelpiece - some of them hold medals from down under, others run out of fingers to count final appearances on and a lot can boast impressive individual honours as well.
  • We only have to beat the Aussies once! We generally can beat them at least once in a series, but unfortunately this has often come early in series rather than when trophies are on the line. We might time it right this time.
  • We're at home! Ok, we're playing a game in Cardiff and potentially (hopefully!!) a game in London but tickets are all reasonably priced and we have ages to save up and get them so lets get out and support the team. Try and make being at home an advantage. And don't just go to sit back and watch the world class players from the other side of the world, go to watch and cheer our own world class players on.
Assuming a squad size of 24 players like the last time around, this is my squad - and tell me if you don't think we have a lot more than a punchers chance with this lot:

1.  Sam Tomkins (Wigan Warriors - 1 SL, 1 CC)
2.  Ryan Hall (Leeds Rhinos - 4 SL, 1 WCC)
3.  Kallum Watkins (Leeds Rhinos - 1 SL, 1 WCC)
4.  Jack Reed (Brisbane Broncos)
5.  Tom Briscoe (Hull FC)
6.  Kevin Sinfield (Leeds Rhinos - 6 SL, 3 WCC)
7.  Gareth Widdop (Melbourne Storm - 1 NRL)
8.  Sam Burgess (South Sydney Rabbitohs)
9.  James Roby (St Helens - 1 SL, 3 CC, 1 WCC)
10. James Graham (Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs - 1 SL, 3 CC, 1 WCC)
11. Gareth Ellis (Hull FC - 2 SL, 2 WCC)
12. Gareth Hock (Wigan Warriors)
13. Sean O'Loughlin (Wigan Warriors - 1 SL, 1 CC)

14. Adrian Morley (Warrington Wolves - 1 SL, 4 CC, 1 NRL, 1 WCC)
15. Luke Burgess (South Sydney Rabbitohs - 1 SL)
16. Ben Westwood (Warrington Wolves - 3 CC)
17. Rob Burrow (Leeds Rhinos - 6 SL, 3 CC)

18. Zak Hardaker (Leeds Rhinos - 2 SL)
19. Josh Charnley (Wigan Warriors - 1 CC)
20. Michael McIlorum (Wigan Warriors - 1 SL, 1 CC)
21. Chris Heighington (Cronulla Sharks - 1 NRL)
22. Chris Hill (Warrington Wolves - 1 CC)
23. Richie Myler (Warrington Wolves - 1 CC)
24. Leroy Cudjoe (Huddersfield Giants)
 
I accept I'm being optimistic and we need it all to fall into place perfectly, but I really don't think I'm being delusional. COME ON ENGLAND!!!